Devall v. Boatner
This text of 2 La. Ann. 271 (Devall v. Boatner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the court was pronounced by
It being agreed by counsel, that this court decide on the correctness of the order of the District Court, in refusing to grant leave to the intervenor to make the City Bank of New Orleans a party to this suit, by reason of the said consent given, and in virtue of articles 389 et seq. of the Code of Practice, it is considered by the court that the District Court did not err in refusing the prayer of the intervenors.
The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed, the intervenors paying the costs of this appeal, and the the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 La. Ann. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devall-v-boatner-la-1847.