Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Sela

110 So. 3d 537, 2013 WL 1442170, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5715
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 10, 2013
DocketNo. 4D11-3093
StatusPublished

This text of 110 So. 3d 537 (Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Sela) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Sela, 110 So. 3d 537, 2013 WL 1442170, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5715 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

HANZMAN, MICHAEL, Associate Judge.

Appellant, Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., as Trustee of MSAC 2007-HE6, (Bank), seeks reversal of the trial court’s order striking its pleadings and dismissing the case as a sanction for discovery violations. The Bank asserts that the trial court abused its discretion by failing to make express factual findings demonstrating that such a severe sanction was warranted, as required by Kozel v. Ostendorf, 629 So.2d 817 (Fla.1993). We agree and reverse. See SPS Dev. Co., LLC v. DS Enters. of Palm Beaches, Inc., 970 So.2d 495, 497 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (“Where a trial court exercises the drastic sanction of dismissal, it must make express written findings of fact supporting the conclusion that the failure to obey the court’s order amounts to a willful or deliberate disregard of the court’s order.”).

Reversed.

GROSS and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kozel v. Ostendorf
629 So. 2d 817 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)
Sps Development Co., LLC v. Ds Enterprises
970 So. 2d 495 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 So. 3d 537, 2013 WL 1442170, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 5715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deutsche-bank-national-trust-co-v-sela-fladistctapp-2013.