Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Golding

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Golding

123 A.D.3d 757, 1 N.Y.S.3d 113

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 10, 2014

Docket2013-00197

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 A.D.3d 757 (Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Golding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Golding, 123 A.D.3d 757, 1 N.Y.S.3d 113 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

*758 In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the proposed intervenor, Conroy White, appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.), entered October 25, 2012, as denied his motion for leave to intervene.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellant unduly delayed in seeking leave to intervene in this mortgage foreclosure action. The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion for leave to intervene (see U.S. Bank N.A. v Bisono, 98 AD3d 608 [2012]; JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Edelson, 90 AD3d 996 [2011]; T & v Constr. Corp. v Pratti, 72 AD3d 1065 [2010]).

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*758 In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the proposed intervenor, Conroy White, appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.), entered October 25, 2012, as denied his motion for leave to intervene.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The appellant unduly delayed in seeking leave to intervene in this mortgage foreclosure action. The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion for leave to intervene (see U.S. Bank N.A. v Bisono, 98 AD3d 608 [2012]; JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Edelson, 90 AD3d 996 [2011]; T & v Constr. Corp. v Pratti, 72 AD3d 1065 [2010]).

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 A.D.3d 757, 1 N.Y.S.3d 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deutsche-bank-national-trust-co-v-golding-nyappdiv-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack