Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch v. Finepoint Capital LP

S.D. New York

Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch v. Finepoint Capital LP

DecidedJuly 2, 2025

Docket1:24-cv-04567

StatusUnknown

This text of Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch v. Finepoint Capital LP (Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch v. Finepoint Capital LP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch v. Finepoint Capital LP, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee KX DEUTSCHE BANK AG, LONDON BRANCH, : Plaintiff, : : 24 Civ. 4567 (JPC) -v- : : ORDER FINEPOINT CAPITAL LP et al., : Defendants. :

KX JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge: The parties are directed to appear at a telephonic conference at 3:00 p.m. on July 8, 2025. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will conduct the conference via Webex. At the scheduled time, counsel for all parties should call (855) 244-8681, access code 2302 755 2307. The parties should be prepared to discuss the following issues at the conference: 1. Whether Plaintiffs Complaint, Dkt. 1, plausibly alleges Defendants’ state(s) of citizenship for purposes of establishing complete diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. See, e.g., Pattern Energy Grp. LP v. Perillo, No. 25 Civ. 785 (JLR), 2025 WL 1112848, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 15, 2025) (“Since [the party] is a limited partnership, its citizenship depends on the citizenship of each of its general and limited partners.”); FD Special Opportunities V, LLC v. Silver Arch Cap. Partners, LLC, No. 21 Civ. 797 (JLR), 2022 WL 16837967, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 2022) (“Courts in this Circuit consistently find subject matter jurisdiction lacking where, like here, the plaintiff has not specifically alleged the identity and citizenship of each member of each relevant limited liability company.”). 2. Whether Plaintiffs First and Third Causes of Action, for breach of contract, are properly analyzed pursuant the standards for alleging breach of a binding Type II preliminary agreement and, if so, whether Plaintiff plausibly alleges that Defendants failed to negotiate a final Assignment of Claim Agreement in good faith. See, e.g., Gas Nat., Inc. v. Iberdrola, S\A., 33 F. Supp. 3d 373, 378-85 (S.D.N.Y. 2014); Dkt. 29 at 14-18. SO ORDERED. Vihar Dated: July 2, 2025 New York, New York JOHN P. CRONAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee KX DEUTSCHE BANK AG, LONDON BRANCH, : Plaintiff, : : 24 Civ. 4567 (JPC) -v- : : ORDER FINEPOINT CAPITAL LP et al., : Defendants. :

KX JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge: The parties are directed to appear at a telephonic conference at 3:00 p.m. on July 8, 2025. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will conduct the conference via Webex. At the scheduled time, counsel for all parties should call (855) 244-8681, access code 2302 755 2307. The parties should be prepared to discuss the following issues at the conference: 1. Whether Plaintiffs Complaint, Dkt. 1, plausibly alleges Defendants’ state(s) of citizenship for purposes of establishing complete diversity of citizenship under 28 U.S.C. § 1332. See, e.g., Pattern Energy Grp. LP v. Perillo, No. 25 Civ. 785 (JLR), 2025 WL 1112848, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 15, 2025) (“Since [the party] is a limited partnership, its citizenship depends on the citizenship of each of its general and limited partners.”); FD Special Opportunities V, LLC v. Silver Arch Cap. Partners, LLC, No. 21 Civ. 797 (JLR), 2022 WL 16837967, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 9, 2022) (“Courts in this Circuit consistently find subject matter jurisdiction lacking where, like here, the plaintiff has not specifically alleged the identity and citizenship of each member of each relevant limited liability company.”). 2. Whether Plaintiffs First and Third Causes of Action, for breach of contract, are properly analyzed pursuant the standards for alleging breach of a binding Type II preliminary agreement and, if so, whether Plaintiff plausibly alleges that Defendants failed to negotiate a final Assignment of Claim Agreement in good faith. See, e.g., Gas Nat., Inc. v. Iberdrola, S\A., 33 F. Supp. 3d 373, 378-85 (S.D.N.Y. 2014); Dkt. 29 at 14-18. SO ORDERED. Vihar Dated: July 2, 2025 New York, New York JOHN P. CRONAN United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Deutsche Bank AG, London Branch v. Finepoint Capital LP, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deutsche-bank-ag-london-branch-v-finepoint-capital-lp-nysd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack