Deutchman v. Human

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Deutchman v. Human

283 A.D. 879, 129 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5636

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 12, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D. 879 (Deutchman v. Human) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deutchman v. Human, 283 A.D. 879, 129 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5636 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by plaintiff Mary Deutchman to recover damages for personal injuries and by her husband to recover for loss of services and for medical expenses, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiffs against defendants Human and Siebert, and the court dismissed the cross complaint of defendant Human against defendant Siebert. Defendant Human appeals from the amended judgment entered thereon, and defendant Siebert appeals from that judgment, except insofar as it dismissed defendant Human’s cross complaint. Amended judgment unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs to plaintiffs. No opinion. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., MaeCrate, Schmidt, Beldoek and Murphy, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by plaintiff Mary Deutchman to recover damages for personal injuries and by her husband to recover for loss of services and for medical expenses, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiffs against defendants Human and Siebert, and the court dismissed the cross complaint of defendant Human against defendant Siebert. Defendant Human appeals from the amended judgment entered thereon, and defendant Siebert appeals from that judgment, except insofar as it dismissed defendant Human’s cross complaint. Amended judgment unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs to plaintiffs. No opinion. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., MaeCrate, Schmidt, Beldoek and Murphy, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 879, 129 N.Y.S.2d 905, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deutchman-v-human-nyappdiv-1954.