Deutche Bank National Trust Co. v. Thomas

702 F. App'x 180
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 20, 2017
DocketNo. 17-1949
StatusPublished

This text of 702 F. App'x 180 (Deutche Bank National Trust Co. v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deutche Bank National Trust Co. v. Thomas, 702 F. App'x 180 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Helen Valencia Thomas has noted an appeal from the district court’s order remanding a removed foreclosure action to South Carolina state,court. “[A] district court may remand a case sua sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time, 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) [(2012)], and such an order is not reviewable, id. § 1447(d).” Doe v. Blair, 819 F.3d 64, 66-67 (4th Cir. 2016). The district court remanded Thomas’ removed action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, explaining that the complaint did not present a federal question and that diversity of citizenship was lacking. Because the district court remanded the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, we lack jurisdiction to review its order. Id. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oi'al argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Doe Ex Rel. Houdersheldt v. Blair
819 F.3d 64 (Fourth Circuit, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
702 F. App'x 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deutche-bank-national-trust-co-v-thomas-ca4-2017.