Deuser v. Precision Construction & Development, Inc.

149 A.D.3d 1540, 51 N.Y.S.3d 449

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John L. Michalski, A.J.), entered April 13, 2016. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant Precision Construction & Development, Inc. for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Precision Construction & Development, Inc. (defendant) appeals from an order that, inter alia, denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. “The right to appeal from an intermediate order terminates with the entry of a final judgment” (City of Syracuse v COR Dev. Co., LLC, 147 AD3d 1510, 1510 [2017] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]; see generally CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). Because a final judgment in this action was entered on January 17, 2017, defendant’s appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed. Defendant may raise its contentions in an appeal from the final judgment (see generally Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v Roberts & Roberts, 63 AD2d 566, 567 [1978]).

Present — Whalen, P.J., Lindley, NeMoyer, Curran and Troutman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deuser v. Precision Construction & Development, Inc., 149 A.D.3d 1540, 51 N.Y.S.3d 449 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

149 A.D.3d 1540 (Deuser v. Precision Construction & Development, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
Chase Manhattan Bank v. Roberts & Roberts, Inc.
63 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)