Deuch v. Seaside Lodge

38 P. 337, 26 Or. 385, 1894 Ore. LEXIS 112
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 3, 1894
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 38 P. 337 (Deuch v. Seaside Lodge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deuch v. Seaside Lodge, 38 P. 337, 26 Or. 385, 1894 Ore. LEXIS 112 (Or. 1894).

Opinion

JPer Curiam.

The statute requires the appellant to specify in his notice the grounds of error upon which he intends to rely upon appeal from a judgment of the circuit court rendered in an action at law: Hill’s Code, § 537. The assignment of errors in a notice of appeal from a judgment rendered in an action at law is the pleading, and the service of such a notice upon the respondent is the process which confers upon the appellate tribunal jurisdiction of the person of the respondent and subject matter of the action. What the statute has required is a condition precedent to the right of appeal, and the failure to specify in the notice the grounds of error upon which the appellant intended to rely upon appeal, gave this court no jurisdiction of the subject matter, and for this reason the appeal is dismissed. Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oregon Art Tile Co. v. Hegele
164 P. 548 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 P. 337, 26 Or. 385, 1894 Ore. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deuch-v-seaside-lodge-or-1894.