Deubel v. Kahn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Deubel v. Kahn

19 A.D.2d 617, 241 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3534

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 25, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 617 (Deubel v. Kahn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deubel v. Kahn, 19 A.D.2d 617, 241 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3534 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order of Family Court, denying defendant’s motion for an examination before trial in a paternity proceeding, dismissed, without costs. Appeals to the Appellate Division from orders of the Family Court may only be taken as of right from orders of disposition (Family Court Act, § 1012). An order of disposition is one that follows after a hearing upon a petition (§ 833) and makes one of the determinations on that petition set out in section 841. Appeals from any other order are discretionary with the Appellate Division (§ 1012). As no application for leave to appeal was made, the appeal is not properly before the court. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order of Family Court, denying defendant’s motion for an examination before trial in a paternity proceeding, dismissed, without costs. Appeals to the Appellate Division from orders of the Family Court may only be taken as of right from orders of disposition (Family Court Act, § 1012). An order of disposition is one that follows after a hearing upon a petition (§ 833) and makes one of the determinations on that petition set out in section 841. Appeals from any other order are discretionary with the Appellate Division (§ 1012). As no application for leave to appeal was made, the appeal is not properly before the court. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 617, 241 N.Y.S.2d 308, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deubel-v-kahn-nyappdiv-1963.