Detzler v. Cox

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Detzler v. Cox. Read the opinion of the Court — 397 F. App'x 850
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 6, 2010·No. 10-6920·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6920

MATTHEW DETZLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KIM COX, Treatment Program Supervisor,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:10-cv-00552-GBL-TCB)

Submitted: September 28, 2010 Decided: October 6, 2010

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Matthew Detzler, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Matthew Detzler appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. Detzler v. Cox, No.

1:10-cv-00552-GBL-TCB (E.D. Va. June 11, 2010). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Detzler v. Cox, (4th Cir. 2010).

Detzler v. Cox (Detzler v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)