Detwiler Vs. Baker Boyer Nat'L Bank

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 10, 2021
Docket81594
StatusPublished

This text of Detwiler Vs. Baker Boyer Nat'L Bank (Detwiler Vs. Baker Boyer Nat'L Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Detwiler Vs. Baker Boyer Nat'L Bank, (Neb. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

EDWARD N. DETWILER, No. 81594 Appellant, VS. BAKER BOYER NATIONAL BANK, A FILED WASHINGTON CORPORATION, Res a ondent. NOV 1 0 2021 ELIZABEM A. BROWN CLERK W VpREME COURT . BY D- DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a postjudgment charging order entered against a non-party to the proceedings. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Richard Scotti, Judge. Because appellant is not a named aggrieved party with standing to appeal, this court directed appellant to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed. See NRAP 3A(a); Valley Bank of Nevada v. Ginsburg, 110 Nev. 440, 874 P.2d 729 (1994). Appellant has responded and largely concedes that appellant is a non-party but argues the district court has treated him as one and so should this court. This court does not have discretion to accept appeals over which the court lacks jurisdiction. See Callie v. Bowling, 123 Nev. 181, 186 n. 10, 160 P.3d 878, 881 n. 10 (2007) ([W]henever a judgment creditor seeks to collect on a judgment from a nonparty, the judgment creditor must file an independent action."); see also DeMaranuille v. Empr.s Ins. Co. of Nev., 135 Nev. 259, 268 448 P.3d 526, 534 (2019) (rejecting a nonparty's proposition that it was deprived of due process because the nonparty had standing as a respondent). This court previously rejected appellant's arguments that because he has been "treated as a party" by the district court he should have SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A 4611D c72 ) 3229 standing to appeal. See Detwiler v. Baker Boyer National Bank, Docket No. 81017 (Order Dismissing Appeal, May 5, 2020). This court defines a party as someone who has been named as a party to the lawsuit and who has been served with process or has appeared. Valley Bank of Nevada v. Ginsburg, 110 Nev. 440, 448, 874 P.2d 729, 735 (1994) (citing Garaventa Land & Livestock Co. v. Second Judicial Dist. Court, 61 Nev. 350, 354, 128 P.2d 266, 267-68 (1942)). Appellant has not been named or served, thus it does not appear that appellant was a party to the action below. Therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

J. Cadish

Piekm J. Pickering

Herndon

cc: Hon. Richard Scotti, District Judge Stephen E. Haberfeld, Settlement Judge Hutchison & Steffen, LLC/Las Vegas Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 4150V0 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Valley Bank of Nevada v. Ginsburg
874 P.2d 729 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1994)
Callie v. Bowling
160 P.3d 878 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Detwiler Vs. Baker Boyer Nat'L Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/detwiler-vs-baker-boyer-natl-bank-nev-2021.