Detroit Teachers Credit Union v. Goldman

652 So. 2d 1284, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4036, 1995 WL 228676
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 19, 1995
DocketNo. 94-2961
StatusPublished

This text of 652 So. 2d 1284 (Detroit Teachers Credit Union v. Goldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Detroit Teachers Credit Union v. Goldman, 652 So. 2d 1284, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4036, 1995 WL 228676 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Godfrey v. Neumann, 373 So.2d 920 (Fla.1979); see also Jay Pontiac, Inc. v. Whigham, 485 So.2d 1171 (Ala.Civ. App.1986); Stupar v. Bank of Westmont, 40 [1285]*1285Ill.pp.3d 514, 352 N.E.2d 29 (1976); Arterbury v. American Bank & Trust Co., 553 S.W.2d 943 (Tex.Civ.App.1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Godfrey v. Neumann
373 So. 2d 920 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)
Stupar v. Bank of Westmont
352 N.E.2d 29 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1976)
Arterbury v. American Bank & Trust Co.
553 S.W.2d 943 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1977)
Jay Pontiac, Inc. v. Whigham
485 So. 2d 1171 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
652 So. 2d 1284, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 4036, 1995 WL 228676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/detroit-teachers-credit-union-v-goldman-fladistctapp-1995.