Detroit Plastic Molding Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

Sixth Circuit

Detroit Plastic Molding Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

519 F.2d 816, 90 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2762, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14190

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedJune 16, 1975

Docket74-2177

StatusPublished

This text of 519 F.2d 816 (Detroit Plastic Molding Co. v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Detroit Plastic Molding Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 519 F.2d 816, 90 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2762, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14190 (6th Cir. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This case is before the Court upon the petition of Detroit Plastic Molding Company for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board issued October 8, 1974, and reported at 213 NLRB No. 120. The Board has cross-applied for enforcement of its order.

It was the finding of the Board that the company violated Sec. 8(a)(1) of the Act in that during the election campaign it engaged in certain coercive activities which violated the Act, making it impossible to have a free and unhindered election, and causing the union to lose the election.

While it appears that some of the findings of the Administrative Law Judge, adopted by the Board, are arguably unsupported, the Court is of the opinion that many of the findings of the Administrative Law Judge are supported by substantial evidence and fully justified the conclusion that the company violated the Act.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the petition for review be and the same is hereby denied, and that the order of the Board be and it is hereby enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This case is before the Court upon the petition of Detroit Plastic Molding Company for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board issued October 8, 1974, and reported at 213 NLRB No. 120. The Board has cross-applied for enforcement of its order.

It was the finding of the Board that the company violated Sec. 8(a)(1) of the Act in that during the election campaign it engaged in certain coercive activities which violated the Act, making it impossible to have a free and unhindered election, and causing the union to lose the election.

While it appears that some of the findings of the Administrative Law Judge, adopted by the Board, are arguably unsupported, the Court is of the opinion that many of the findings of the Administrative Law Judge are supported by substantial evidence and fully justified the conclusion that the company violated the Act.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the petition for review be and the same is hereby denied, and that the order of the Board be and it is hereby enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

519 F.2d 816, 90 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2762, 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 14190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/detroit-plastic-molding-co-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca6-1975.