Detroit Mortgage & Realty Co. v. Rogers

Michigan Court of Appeals

Detroit Mortgage & Realty Co. v. Rogers

166 N.W.2d 60, 14 Mich. App. 735, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 979

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided December 19, 1968·No. Docket No. 3,106·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendants proposed to construct apartment buildings in Bloomfield Township, Michigan, and negotiated with plaintiff to secure a loan to finance construction. Defendants agreed to pay plaintiff $6,400 for obtaining a commitment from a lender. After plaintiff secured a commitment from a lender, defendants refused to consummate the loan. Plaintiff brought suit for the contract price as the fair value of its services, and plaintiff recovered a judgment for $6,400. Defendants appeal.

An examination of the records and briefs discloses no prejudicial error.

Affirmed with costs to plaintiff.

McGregor, P, J., and Quinn and Letts, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendants proposed to construct apartment buildings in Bloomfield Township, Michigan, and negotiated with plaintiff to secure a loan to finance construction. Defendants agreed to pay plaintiff $6,400 for obtaining a commitment from a lender. After plaintiff secured a commitment from a lender, defendants refused to consummate the loan. Plaintiff brought suit for the contract price as the fair value of its services, and plaintiff recovered a judgment for $6,400. Defendants appeal.

An examination of the records and briefs discloses no prejudicial error.

Affirmed with costs to plaintiff.

McGregor, P, J., and Quinn and Letts, JJ., concurred.

Detroit Mortgage & Realty Co. v. Rogers, 166 N.W.2d 60, 14 Mich. App. 735, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 979 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

166 N.W.2d 60 (Detroit Mortgage & Realty Co. v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.