Detroit Edison Co. v. Township of Oakland

Michigan Court of Appeals

Detroit Edison Co. v. Township of Oakland

175 N.W.2d 342, 21 Mich. App. 250, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 2089

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 29, 1970

DocketDocket No. 7,867

StatusPublished

This text of 175 N.W.2d 342 (Detroit Edison Co. v. Township of Oakland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Detroit Edison Co. v. Township of Oakland, 175 N.W.2d 342, 21 Mich. App. 250, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 2089 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff is the holder of a 30-year franchise granted in 1942 by defendant Oakland Township. This franchise allowed plaintiff the right to locate equipment over township highways and the right to trim and cut trees as necessary for the [251]*251safety of their equipment. Such activities are, by the franchise, subject to the approval of the township.

In the course of building a new power line plaintiff obtained permission and constructed three towers over roads in the township. At one point the branches of three trees grew too near the power-line, and permission to trim them was requested. Permission was denied by defendant. Plaintiff commenced this action for mandamus in Oakland County Circuit Court contending that permission had been wrongfully refused and should now be ordered.

On August 6,1969, the trial court judge found that the refusal of the township to grant permission was unreasonable and arbitrary, and the writ of mandamus was issued. An emergency appeal and stay of proceedings followed.

Defendant contends that its refusal of permission was a proper exercise of certain of its rights under the franchise agreement. It further contends that its refusal was not arbitrary but was contingent upon the decision of the circuit court in another case, allegedly related to this one.

Recently the Supreme Court handed down Detroit Edison Company v. City of Wixom (1969), 382 Mich 673, which we think is dispositive of the issues raised by defendant here. Even if the trial court erred in granting mandamus at the time of trial, it is cleár that under Detroit Edison Company v. City of Wixom, supra, mandamus could issue on remand. Therefore, since we have the authority to grant such equitable relief under Detroit Edison Company v. City of Wixom and GCR 1963, 820.1(7), we order that the circuit court upon remand issue the writ of mandamus.

No costs, a public question being involved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff is the holder of a 30-year franchise granted in 1942 by defendant Oakland Township. This franchise allowed plaintiff the right to locate equipment over township highways and the right to trim and cut trees as necessary for the [251]*251safety of their equipment. Such activities are, by the franchise, subject to the approval of the township.

In the course of building a new power line plaintiff obtained permission and constructed three towers over roads in the township. At one point the branches of three trees grew too near the power-line, and permission to trim them was requested. Permission was denied by defendant. Plaintiff commenced this action for mandamus in Oakland County Circuit Court contending that permission had been wrongfully refused and should now be ordered.

On August 6,1969, the trial court judge found that the refusal of the township to grant permission was unreasonable and arbitrary, and the writ of mandamus was issued. An emergency appeal and stay of proceedings followed.

Defendant contends that its refusal of permission was a proper exercise of certain of its rights under the franchise agreement. It further contends that its refusal was not arbitrary but was contingent upon the decision of the circuit court in another case, allegedly related to this one.

Recently the Supreme Court handed down Detroit Edison Company v. City of Wixom (1969), 382 Mich 673, which we think is dispositive of the issues raised by defendant here. Even if the trial court erred in granting mandamus at the time of trial, it is cleár that under Detroit Edison Company v. City of Wixom, supra, mandamus could issue on remand. Therefore, since we have the authority to grant such equitable relief under Detroit Edison Company v. City of Wixom and GCR 1963, 820.1(7), we order that the circuit court upon remand issue the writ of mandamus.

No costs, a public question being involved.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 N.W.2d 342, 21 Mich. App. 250, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 2089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/detroit-edison-co-v-township-of-oakland-michctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack