Detroit Club v. United States

22 F. Supp. 424, 86 Ct. Cl. 549, 20 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 900, 1938 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 226
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedMarch 7, 1938
DocketNo. 42947
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 F. Supp. 424 (Detroit Club v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Detroit Club v. United States, 22 F. Supp. 424, 86 Ct. Cl. 549, 20 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 900, 1938 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 226 (cc 1938).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The facts of the case are clearly set forth in the findings. Plaintiff is a club organization which has been required by the Commissioner to pay taxes upon dues which it received on the ground that it is a social club within the meaning of the law. This is denied by the plaintiff and, a claim for refund having been duly filed, it seeks to recover1 the duesi so paid.

It may be that the predominant purpose of the club is the serving of luncheons to its members, but the commissioner of this court has found that the social features as set out in the findings were quite attractive and not merely incidental, but constituted an essential factor in its existence. In this finding we concur, and under repeated decisions of this court the plaintiff’s petition must be dismissed. It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Park Club v. United States
29 F. Supp. 872 (Court of Claims, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 F. Supp. 424, 86 Ct. Cl. 549, 20 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 900, 1938 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/detroit-club-v-united-states-cc-1938.