Detmering v. City of Fayetteville

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Detmering v. City of Fayetteville

92 S.E. 230, 19 Ga. App. 747, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 339

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 21, 1917

Docket8560

StatusPublished

This text of 92 S.E. 230 (Detmering v. City of Fayetteville) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Detmering v. City of Fayetteville, 92 S.E. 230, 19 Ga. App. 747, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 339 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

The petition for certiorari did not show that the bond provided for in the act of 1902 (Park’s Annot. Code, § 5191 (a)) had been given. Kendricks v. Millen, 16 Ga. App. 273 (85 S. E. 264) ; Hubert v. Thomasville, 18 Ga. App. 756 (90 S. E. 720). No error of law is complained of; and besides, the evidence authorized the conviction of the accused in the police court. Accordingly the court did not err in refusing to sanction the petition for certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur.

Petition for certiorari; from Fayette superior court—Judge Searcy. February 1, 1917.

Lester G. Diclcson, for plaintiff in error. J. W. Culpepper, E. M. Owen, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI