Detmering v. City of Fayetteville

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Detmering v. City of Fayetteville

92 S.E. 230, 19 Ga. App. 747, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 339

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 21, 1917·No. 8560·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The petition for certiorari did not show that the bond provided for in the act of 1902 (Park’s Annot. Code, § 5191 (a)) had been given. Kendricks v. Millen, 16 Ga. App. 273 (85 S. E. 264) ; Hubert v. Thomasville, 18 Ga. App. 756 (90 S. E. 720). No error of law is complained of; and besides, the evidence authorized the conviction of the accused in the police court. Accordingly the court did not err in refusing to sanction the petition for certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur.

Petition for certiorari; from Fayette superior court—Judge Searcy. February 1, 1917.

Lester G. Diclcson, for plaintiff in error. J. W. Culpepper, E. M. Owen, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The petition for certiorari did not show that the bond provided for in the act of 1902 (Park’s Annot. Code, § 5191 (a)) had been given. Kendricks v. Millen, 16 Ga. App. 273 (85 S. E. 264) ; Hubert v. Thomasville, 18 Ga. App. 756 (90 S. E. 720). No error of law is complained of; and besides, the evidence authorized the conviction of the accused in the police court. Accordingly the court did not err in refusing to sanction the petition for certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, O. J., and George, J., concur.

Petition for certiorari; from Fayette superior court—Judge Searcy. February 1, 1917.

Lester G. Diclcson, for plaintiff in error. J. W. Culpepper, E. M. Owen, contra.

Detmering v. City of Fayetteville, 92 S.E. 230, 19 Ga. App. 747, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 339 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

92 S.E. 230 (Detmering v. City of Fayetteville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related