Detherage v. Montgomery
This text of 67 Ky. 46 (Detherage v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion oe the court:
The issue presented by the pleadings was submitted to a jury, and after the rendition of a verdict, and judgment thereon, no motion was made for a new trial, but an appeal by the defendant below was prayed to this court, and time obtained to make out and have allowed a bill of exceptions.
[47]*47In Humphreys vs. Walton, 2 Bush, 580, this court said : “ On an issue, and trial of a fact by a jury, a motion for a new trial is essential to correct the errors growing out of the evidence or instructions, before an appeal can be entertained by this court:”
The failure, therefore, of appellant to move for a new trial in the court below, to have the errors complained of corrected, precludes him from the opportunity of having them corrected here.
Wherefore, the judgment must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
67 Ky. 46, 4 Bush 46, 1868 Ky. LEXIS 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/detherage-v-montgomery-kyctapp-1868.