Detherage v. Montgomery

67 Ky. 46, 4 Bush 46, 1868 Ky. LEXIS 76
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided September 29, 1868·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

JUDGE PETERS

delivered the opinion oe the court:

The issue presented by the pleadings was submitted to a jury, and after the rendition of a verdict, and judgment thereon, no motion was made for a new trial, but an appeal by the defendant below was prayed to this court, and time obtained to make out and have allowed a bill of exceptions.

[47]*47In Humphreys vs. Walton, 2 Bush, 580, this court said : “ On an issue, and trial of a fact by a jury, a motion for a new trial is essential to correct the errors growing out of the evidence or instructions, before an appeal can be entertained by this court:”

The failure, therefore, of appellant to move for a new trial in the court below, to have the errors complained of corrected, precludes him from the opportunity of having them corrected here.

Wherefore, the judgment must be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Detherage v. Montgomery, 67 Ky. 46, 4 Bush 46, 1868 Ky. LEXIS 76 (Ky. Ct. App. 1868).

67 Ky. 46 (Detherage v. Montgomery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Danks v. Rodeheaver
26 W. Va. 274 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1885)
United States v. Trabing
6 P. 721 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1885)
Commonwealth v. Cookendorfer
4 Ky. Op. 616 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1871)