Deters v. Federal Aviation Administration
This text of 685 F. App'x 511 (Deters v. Federal Aviation Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Minnesota resident Dennis Deters petitions this Court for review after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) denied him a medical certificate needed to reestablish his private pilot’s license. He has also filed a motion to supplement the record.
We have reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, and we conclude that the FAA’s decision was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or without support in the law. See Reder v. Adm’r of FAA, 116 F.3d 1261, 1263 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review). We deny the petition for review and deny as moot Deters’s motion to supplement the record.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
685 F. App'x 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deters-v-federal-aviation-administration-ca8-2017.