Determann v. Anser, Inc.
This text of 859 So. 2d 548 (Determann v. Anser, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kurt DETERMANN and Stanley Bach, Appellants,
v.
ANSER, INC., a Florida corporation, and Anser Therma Technologies, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
John J. Anastasio, Port St. Lucie, for appellants.
Harold G. Melville, Fort Pierce, for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's order assessing attorney's fees against appellants pursuant to section 57.105, Florida Statutes, as we find appellants' arguments to be without merit. To the extent appellants argue that chapter 99-225, which amended section 57.105, is unconstitutional as violative of the single subject rule, we align ourselves with the first and third districts, which have rejected similar arguments. See Budget Rent-A-Car Systems v. Eddie Bennett, 847 So.2d 579 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Hughes, 833 So.2d 832 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
AFFIRMED.
STONE, POLEN and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
859 So. 2d 548, 2003 WL 22717685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/determann-v-anser-inc-fladistctapp-2003.