Deter v. Deter

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Deter v. Deter

393 So. 2d 72, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18743

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 4, 1981

DocketNo. 80-150

StatusPublished

This text of 393 So. 2d 72 (Deter v. Deter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deter v. Deter, 393 So. 2d 72, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18743 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

This appeal is dismissed on authority of S. L. T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97 (Fla.1974), and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(3).

The cross-appeal is stricken as untimely. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.110(b) and (g). We note, however, that this action is without prejudice to the right of the petitioner wife to challenge, by timely appeal after the continued contempt hearing is held, any action by the trial court erroneously placing upon her the burden of proof in regard to the ability to pay of the respondent, a burden which clearly is his. See Faircloth v. Faircloth, 339 So.2d 650 (Fla.1976); Yandell v. Yandell, 160 Fla. 164, 33 So.2d 869 (1948).

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COBB, Judge.

This appeal is dismissed on authority of S. L. T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97 (Fla.1974), and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(3).

The cross-appeal is stricken as untimely. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.110(b) and (g). We note, however, that this action is without prejudice to the right of the petitioner wife to challenge, by timely appeal after the continued contempt hearing is held, any action by the trial court erroneously placing upon her the burden of proof in regard to the ability to pay of the respondent, a burden which clearly is his. See Faircloth v. Faircloth, 339 So.2d 650 (Fla.1976); Yandell v. Yandell, 160 Fla. 164, 33 So.2d 869 (1948).

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

393 So. 2d 72, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 18743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deter-v-deter-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack