DeTemple v. Sheehan

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 23, 2002
• Docket: 01-2409
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2409

In Re: GARY L. DETEMPLE,

Debtor.

GARY L. DETEMPLE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARTIN P. SHEEHAN, Trustee; JOHN N. CHARNOCK, JR., Trustee; THOMAS H. FLUHARTY, Trustee,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Party in Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-149-5, BK-95-50154)

Submitted: July 31, 2002 Decided: August 23, 2002

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gary L. DeTemple, Appellant Pro Se. Martin P. Sheehan, SHEEHAN & NUGENT, Wheeling, West Virginia; John N. Charnock, Jr., CHARNOCK & CHARNOCK, Charleston, West Virginia; Thomas H. Fluharty, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Gary L. DeTemple appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to reconsider a prior order denying his motion for

recusal of the district court judge. Our review of the record and

the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

DeTemple v. Sheehan, Nos. CA-00-149-5; BK-95-50154 (N.D.W. Va.

Oct. 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED