DeTemple v. Sheehan

Fourth Circuit

DeTemple v. Sheehan

42 F. App'x 664

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 23, 2002·No. No. 01-2409·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gary L. DeTemple appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider a prior order denying his motion for recusal of the district court judge. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. DeTemple v. Sheehan, Nos. CA-00-149-5; BK-95-50154 (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Gary L. DeTemple appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider a prior order denying his motion for recusal of the district court judge. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. DeTemple v. Sheehan, Nos. CA-00-149-5; BK-95-50154 (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 9, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

DeTemple v. Sheehan, 42 F. App'x 664 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

42 F. App'x 664 (DeTemple v. Sheehan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.