Detective George Schilter and Shriners Hospitals for Children v. Cadence Bank, N.A.

Opinion

Opinion issued November 13, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c).

Further, although appellants failed to include a certificate of conference in their

motion, appellants’ motion includes a certificate of service, more than 10 days

have passed since the motion was filed, and no party has responded to the motion.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a).

Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal, grant appellants’ motion, and dismiss

the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We also dismiss all other pending

motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Gunn, and Caughey.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-22-00317-CV ——————————— DETECTIVE GEORGE SCHILTER AND SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN, Appellants V. CADENCE BANK, N.A., Appellee On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 3 Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 442,669 MEMORANDUM OPINION We previously abated this appeal for the parties to finalize their settlement. Appellants have now filed a “Status Report,” stating that the parties have resolved their disputes. We interpret appellants’ filing as a motion to dismiss their appeal.