Destry W. Kittman, Glendee Kittman and Martha S. Kittman v. W. Shane Kittman, Donald E. Arthur and Gwen B. Arthur
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-12-00070-CV
Destry W. Kittman, Glendee Kittman and Martha S. Kittman, Appellants
v.
W. Shane Kittman, Donald E. Arthur and Gwen B. Arthur, Appellees
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT
NO. 36643, HONORABLE GUILFORD L. JONES III, JUDGE PRESIDING
O R D E R
PER CURIAM
Counsel for appellants Destry W. Kittman, Glendee Kittman, and Martha S. Kittman has filed an unopposed motion to withdraw and substitute counsel, asking that Scott King Field and the Field Law Firm be permitted to withdraw from representing the appellants and that J. Bruce Bennett of the law firm of Cardwell, Hart & Bennett, LLP be substituted as the appellants' counsel. We grant the motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 6.5.
It is ordered on December 13, 2012.
Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Rose
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Destry W. Kittman, Glendee Kittman and Martha S. Kittman v. W. Shane Kittman, Donald E. Arthur and Gwen B. Arthur (Destry W. Kittman, Glendee Kittman and Martha S. Kittman v. W. Shane Kittman, Donald E. Arthur and Gwen B. Arthur) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.