DeStefano v. Nichols ex rel. Nichols

Supreme Court of Colorado

DeStefano v. Nichols ex rel. Nichols

84 P.3d 496, 2004 Colo. LEXIS 47, 2004 WL 77625

Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided January 20, 2004·No. No. 02SC667·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice Hobbs, Justice Martinez and Justice Bender are of the opinion that the judgment of the Court of Appeals, Case No. 01CA0783, should be affirmed, whereas Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Kourlis and Justice Coats are of the opinion that it should be reversed. Justice Rice does not participate.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by operation of law. C.A.R. 35(e).

Justice RICE does not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Justice Hobbs, Justice Martinez and Justice Bender are of the opinion that the judgment of the Court of Appeals, Case No. 01CA0783, should be affirmed, whereas Chief Justice Mullarkey, Justice Kourlis and Justice Coats are of the opinion that it should be reversed. Justice Rice does not participate.

Since the court is equally divided, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed by operation of law. C.A.R. 35(e).

Justice RICE does not participate.

DeStefano v. Nichols ex rel. Nichols, 84 P.3d 496, 2004 Colo. LEXIS 47, 2004 WL 77625 (Colo. 2004).

Pincite

84 P.3d 496 (DeStefano v. Nichols ex rel. Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.