Dessimone v. Schubert
This text of 731 So. 2d 796 (Dessimone v. Schubert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellee duly domesticated a Venezuelan judgment against the appellant in Florida. Although the defendant unsuccessfully raised an objection to the service of process upon him, he did not appeal from the adverse judgment. His present contention, raised in defense of post-judgment enforcement proceedings, which again claims that the trial court lacked personal jurisdiction, therefore, may no longer be asserted. See State ex rel. Fulton Bag & Cotton Mills v. Burnside, 153 Fla. 599, 15 So.2d 324 (1943); E.H.G. Enters., Inc. v. Amstell, 342 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). For this reason, the order on review, which denied a motion to dismiss those proceedings, is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
731 So. 2d 796, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5113, 1999 WL 228522, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dessimone-v-schubert-fladistctapp-1999.