Desper v. Ponton

521 F. App'x 231
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 29, 2013·No. No. 13-6211·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamie Paul Desper appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to reconsider its order entering summary judgment against his civil rights action, which proceeded under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Sossamon v. Texas, — U.S. -, 181 S.Ct. 1651, 1663, 179 L.Ed.2d 700 (2011); Rendelman v. Rouse, 569 F.3d 182, 186, 189 (4th Cir.2009). See also Lovelace v. Lee, 472 F.3d 174, 187 (4th Cir.2006); In re Long Tenn Admin. Segregation of Inmates Designated, as Five Percenters, 174 F.3d 464, 468-69 (4th Cir.1999).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Desper v. Ponton, 521 F. App'x 231 (4th Cir. 2013).

521 F. App'x 231 (Desper v. Ponton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related