Desper v. Lee

467 F. App'x 226
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 2012
DocketNo. 11-7554
StatusPublished

This text of 467 F. App'x 226 (Desper v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Desper v. Lee, 467 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jamie Paul Desper appeals the district court’s order entering summary judgment on several of the claims raised in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint and dismissing the remainder of them under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Desper v. Lee, No. 7:10-cv-00473-GEC-RSB, 2011 WL 5024587 (WD.Va. Oct. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
467 F. App'x 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/desper-v-lee-ca4-2012.