Despenza v. O'Leary

889 F.2d 113
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedNovember 3, 1989
DocketNos. 89-2011, 89-2028, 89-2072
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 889 F.2d 113 (Despenza v. O'Leary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Despenza v. O'Leary, 889 F.2d 113 (7th Cir. 1989).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The pro se appellants in these unrelated appeals failed to timely file a “Jurisdictional Statement” as required by Circuit Rule 3(c).1 On May 17th (in appeal 89-2011), May 25th (in appeal 89-2028), and May 31st (in appeal 89-2072) the court ordered these appellants to file the required jurisdictional statements within fourteen days of the respective show cause orders. Appellants were advised that failure to comply would [114]*114result in a $100 fine and/or dismissal of the appeal. These appellants have not filed a jurisdictional statement to date. Accordingly,

It is ordered that appeals 89-2011, 89-2028 and 89-2072 are dismissed for failure to file the required Circuit Rule 3(e) jurisdictional statements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
889 F.2d 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/despenza-v-oleary-ca7-1989.