Despenza v. O'Leary

889 F.2d 113
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided November 3, 1989·No. Nos. 89-2011, 89-2028, 89-2072·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The pro se appellants in these unrelated appeals failed to timely file a “Jurisdictional Statement” as required by Circuit Rule 3(c).1 On May 17th (in appeal 89-2011), May 25th (in appeal 89-2028), and May 31st (in appeal 89-2072) the court ordered these appellants to file the required jurisdictional statements within fourteen days of the respective show cause orders. Appellants were advised that failure to comply would [114]*114result in a $100 fine and/or dismissal of the appeal. These appellants have not filed a jurisdictional statement to date. Accordingly,

It is ordered that appeals 89-2011, 89-2028 and 89-2072 are dismissed for failure to file the required Circuit Rule 3(e) jurisdictional statements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Despenza v. O'Leary, 889 F.2d 113 (7th Cir. 1989).

889 F.2d 113 (Despenza v. O'Leary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related