Despeaux v. Delano

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Despeaux v. Delano

59 A. 10, 71 N.J.L. 280, 42 Vroom 280, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 26

DecidedNovember 7, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A. 10 (Despeaux v. Delano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Despeaux v. Delano, 59 A. 10, 71 N.J.L. 280, 42 Vroom 280, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 26 (N.J. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Cuiuam.

This is a demurrer to a declaration. The declaration alleges that the plaintiff for many years, with the assent of the defendants, had maintained a line of pipes upon a certain right of way granted to the plaintiff by the defendants, and that the defendants, without the knowledge of the plaintiff, took up the said pipes and carried them away. This shows a cause of action, regardless of the plaintiff’s right to maintain the pipes under his grant. The declaration sets up an unrevoked license. If the defendants would traverse the fact of license or show.that it had been revoked, they must pledd accordingly. They cannot admit the facts properly pleaded and justify their removal of the plaintiff’s personal property.

Judgment is given for the plaintiff, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cuiuam.

This is a demurrer to a declaration. The declaration alleges that the plaintiff for many years, with the assent of the defendants, had maintained a line of pipes upon a certain right of way granted to the plaintiff by the defendants, and that the defendants, without the knowledge of the plaintiff, took up the said pipes and carried them away. This shows a cause of action, regardless of the plaintiff’s right to maintain the pipes under his grant. The declaration sets up an unrevoked license. If the defendants would traverse the fact of license or show.that it had been revoked, they must pledd accordingly. They cannot admit the facts properly pleaded and justify their removal of the plaintiff’s personal property.

Judgment is given for the plaintiff, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A. 10, 71 N.J.L. 280, 42 Vroom 280, 1904 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/despeaux-v-delano-nj-1904.