Despart v. State
871 So. 2d 312, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6048, 2004 WL 912427
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 30, 2004·No. No. 5D04-731·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Despart appeals from the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) to correct an illegal sentence. Because his appeal is untimely, we dismiss without prejudice to Despart to file a petition for a belated appeal. See Proctor v. State, 845 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Despart v. State, 871 So. 2d 312, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6048, 2004 WL 912427 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
871 So. 2d 312 (Despart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harris v. State
911 So. 2d 221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Ross v. Jim Adams Ford, Inc.
871 So. 2d 312 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)