Despart v. State
871 So. 2d 312, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6048, 2004 WL 912427
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 30, 2004
DocketNo. 5D04-731
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 871 So. 2d 312 (Despart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Despart v. State, 871 So. 2d 312, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6048, 2004 WL 912427 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
Opinion
Despart appeals from the summary denial of his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) to correct an illegal sentence. Because his appeal is untimely, we dismiss without prejudice to Despart to file a petition for a belated appeal. See Proctor v. State, 845 So.2d 1007 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Harris v. State
911 So. 2d 221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Ross v. Jim Adams Ford, Inc.
871 So. 2d 312 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
871 So. 2d 312, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 6048, 2004 WL 912427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/despart-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.