DeSouza v. State
802 So. 2d 1184, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1, 2002 WL 4420
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in DeSouza v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 874 So. 2d 729 →
Opinion
Because there is no allegation that the defendant has actually been “threatened” with deportation, the dismissal of his Peart based motion for post-conviction relief without prejudice is affirmed. See Perez v. Moore, 767 So.2d 1170, 1171 (Fla.2000); Peart v. State, 756 So.2d 42, 47 (Fla.2000); Rodriguez v. State, 789 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
DeSouza v. State, 802 So. 2d 1184, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1, 2002 WL 4420 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
802 So. 2d 1184 (DeSouza v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Peart v. State
756 So. 2d 42 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Rodriguez v. State
789 So. 2d 548 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)