DeSouza v. State
802 So. 2d 1184, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1, 2002 WL 4420
This text of 802 So. 2d 1184 (DeSouza v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
DeSouza v. State, 802 So. 2d 1184, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1, 2002 WL 4420 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
Because there is no allegation that the defendant has actually been “threatened” with deportation, the dismissal of his Peart based motion for post-conviction relief without prejudice is affirmed. See Perez v. Moore, 767 So.2d 1170, 1171 (Fla.2000); Peart v. State, 756 So.2d 42, 47 (Fla.2000); Rodriguez v. State, 789 So.2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Peart v. State
756 So. 2d 42 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Rodriguez v. State
789 So. 2d 548 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
802 So. 2d 1184, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1, 2002 WL 4420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/desouza-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.