Desni C. Kramer v. Darrell D. Bowen and Mary S. Kennedy
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00103-CV
DESNI C. KRAMER APPELLANT
V.
DARRELL D. BOWEN AND MARY APPELLEES S. KENNEDY
------------
FROM THE 393RD DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
We have considered “Appellant’s Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal
With Prejudice.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted;
therefore, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which
let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.
DELIVERED: June 13, 2013
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Desni C. Kramer v. Darrell D. Bowen and Mary S. Kennedy (Desni C. Kramer v. Darrell D. Bowen and Mary S. Kennedy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.