Desmond v. Stebbins

5 N.E. 150, 140 Mass. 339, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 365
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 28, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 5 N.E. 150 (Desmond v. Stebbins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Desmond v. Stebbins, 5 N.E. 150, 140 Mass. 339, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 365 (Mass. 1885).

Opinion

By the Court.

Under the instructions given them, the jury must have found that the contract between the parties was as set out in the declaration, namely, that the defendant employed the plaintiff to procure a purchaser for the land and house of the defendant. There was no written contract. The employment was by an oral agreement, and, upon the evidence, it was competent for the jury to find that it was the ordinary case of the employment of a broker to procure a purchaser. Under such a contract, the broker is entitled to compensation, if he substantially effects a sale by procuring and introducing a purchaser to whom the owner sells the land. The instructions 'at the trial were sufficiently favorable to the defendant.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ober v. Joia
9 Mass. App. Dec. 28 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1955)
Brayman v. Bushey
10 Mass. App. Div. 37 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1945)
Owens v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
63 P.2d 1006 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1936)
Waters v. Pacific Wool Products Co.
167 N.E. 256 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)
Johnstone v. Cochrane
121 N.E. 529 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1919)
W. T. Craft Realty Co. v. Livernash
146 P. 121 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1914)
Handley v. Shaffer
59 So. 286 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1912)
Cohen v. Ames
91 N.E. 212 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
Haskins v. Lewis
20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 603 (Hamilton Circuit Court, 1908)
Fitzpatrick v. Gilson
57 N.E. 1000 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
Bradford v. Laffey
11 Haw. 463 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1898)
Pratt v. Burdon
47 N.E. 419 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Hosmer v. Fuller
47 N.E. 94 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Parker v. Estabrook
44 A. 484 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1895)
Holden v. Starks
34 N.E. 1069 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)
Ward v. Cobb
20 N.E. 174 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 N.E. 150, 140 Mass. 339, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/desmond-v-stebbins-mass-1885.