Desmond v. Stebbins

5 N.E. 150, 140 Mass. 339, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 365
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided November 28, 1885·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

Under the instructions given them, the jury must have found that the contract between the parties was as set out in the declaration, namely, that the defendant employed the plaintiff to procure a purchaser for the land and house of the defendant. There was no written contract. The employment was by an oral agreement, and, upon the evidence, it was competent for the jury to find that it was the ordinary case of the employment of a broker to procure a purchaser. Under such a contract, the broker is entitled to compensation, if he substantially effects a sale by procuring and introducing a purchaser to whom the owner sells the land. The instructions 'at the trial were sufficiently favorable to the defendant.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Desmond v. Stebbins, 5 N.E. 150, 140 Mass. 339, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 365 (Mass. 1885).

5 N.E. 150 (Desmond v. Stebbins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ober v. Joia
9 Mass. App. Dec. 28 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1955)
Brayman v. Bushey
10 Mass. App. Div. 37 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1945)
Owens v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
63 P.2d 1006 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1936)
Waters v. Pacific Wool Products Co.
167 N.E. 256 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1929)
Johnstone v. Cochrane
121 N.E. 529 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1919)
W. T. Craft Realty Co. v. Livernash
146 P. 121 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1914)
Handley v. Shaffer
59 So. 286 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1912)
Cohen v. Ames
91 N.E. 212 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
Haskins v. Lewis
20 Ohio C.C. Dec. 603 (Hamilton Circuit Court, 1908)
Fitzpatrick v. Gilson
57 N.E. 1000 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
Bradford v. Laffey
11 Haw. 463 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1898)
Pratt v. Burdon
47 N.E. 419 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Hosmer v. Fuller
47 N.E. 94 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
Parker v. Estabrook
44 A. 484 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1895)
Holden v. Starks
34 N.E. 1069 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)
Ward v. Cobb
20 N.E. 174 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1889)