Desmond v. Bartlett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Desmond v. Bartlett

52 A.D.2d 605, 382 N.Y.S.2d 108, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12220

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 12, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 A.D.2d 605 (Desmond v. Bartlett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Desmond v. Bartlett, 52 A.D.2d 605, 382 N.Y.S.2d 108, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12220 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 inter alia to compel respondent to certify and appoint petitioners, in proper order, from the existing civil service eligible list to the permanent position of Court Clerk II, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 30, 1974, [606]*606which dismissed their petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We hold that it was within respondent’s authority to promulgate separate and distinct experience requirements for (1) taking the test and (2) appointment from the list (see 22 NYCRR 25.13 [j] [1]). We also hold that petitioners have not satisfied thé experience requirement for appointment to the permanent position of Court Clerk II (see NY Const, art V, § 6; Koso v Greene, 260 NY 491, 495; Matter of Hilsenrad v Miller, 284 NY 445, 450-451). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 inter alia to compel respondent to certify and appoint petitioners, in proper order, from the existing civil service eligible list to the permanent position of Court Clerk II, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 30, 1974, [606]*606which dismissed their petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We hold that it was within respondent’s authority to promulgate separate and distinct experience requirements for (1) taking the test and (2) appointment from the list (see 22 NYCRR 25.13 [j] [1]). We also hold that petitioners have not satisfied thé experience requirement for appointment to the permanent position of Court Clerk II (see NY Const, art V, § 6; Koso v Greene, 260 NY 491, 495; Matter of Hilsenrad v Miller, 284 NY 445, 450-451). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Shapiro and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 605, 382 N.Y.S.2d 108, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/desmond-v-bartlett-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack