DeSmedt v. City of North Miami Beach

District Court of Appeal of Florida

DeSmedt v. City of North Miami Beach

591 So. 2d 1077, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13027, 1991 WL 276885

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 31, 1991

DocketNo. 91-1959

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 591 So. 2d 1077 (DeSmedt v. City of North Miami Beach) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeSmedt v. City of North Miami Beach, 591 So. 2d 1077, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13027, 1991 WL 276885 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The judgment before us dismissed a complaint which sought a declaratory judgment that a resolution of the North Miami City Commission finally approving a site plan was invalid. The basis of the ruling below was that an original action for such relief was inappropriate. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(c),¹ we treat this appeal as an application for cer-tiorari, see City of Deerfield Beach v. Valliant, 419 So.2d 624 (Fla.1982); Save Brickell Avenue, Inc. v. City of Miami, 393 So.2d 1197, 1198 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), and quash the decision below.

Under the appellate rule which we have already invoked, Fla.R.App.P. 9.040(c), the mistaken complaint below should have been treated as an appropriate notice of appeal, see Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(c)(1)(A)²; City of [1078]*1078Deerfield Beach, 419 So.2d at 624; Brickell, 393 So.2d at 1197; see Reed v. City of Hollywood, 483 So.2d 759 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Because the complaint was filed within thirty days of the city commission action sought to be reviewed, there is no jurisdictional impediment to this determination.

Certiorari granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The judgment before us dismissed a complaint which sought a declaratory judgment that a resolution of the North Miami City Commission finally approving a site plan was invalid. The basis of the ruling below was that an original action for such relief was inappropriate. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040(c),¹ we treat this appeal as an application for cer-tiorari, see City of Deerfield Beach v. Valliant, 419 So.2d 624 (Fla.1982); Save Brickell Avenue, Inc. v. City of Miami, 393 So.2d 1197, 1198 n. 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), and quash the decision below.

Under the appellate rule which we have already invoked, Fla.R.App.P. 9.040(c), the mistaken complaint below should have been treated as an appropriate notice of appeal, see Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(c)(1)(A)²; City of [1078]*1078Deerfield Beach, 419 So.2d at 624; Brickell, 393 So.2d at 1197; see Reed v. City of Hollywood, 483 So.2d 759 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). Because the complaint was filed within thirty days of the city commission action sought to be reviewed, there is no jurisdictional impediment to this determination.

Certiorari granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

591 So. 2d 1077, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13027, 1991 WL 276885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/desmedt-v-city-of-north-miami-beach-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack