Desjarlais v. Desjarlais

681 So. 2d 847, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10922, 1996 WL 592638
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1996·No. No. 95-2848·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Henderson v. Henderson, 537 So.2d 125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988), cause dismissed, 542 So.2d 989 (Fla.1989); Evans v. Evans, 490 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); see Smoak v. Smoak, 658 So.2d 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Wages v. Wages, 660 So.2d 797 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Elkins v. Vanden Bosch, 433 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), pet. for review dismissed, 438 So.2d 831(Fla.1983); Adams v. Adams, 385 So.2d 688 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Ritsi v. Ritsi 160 So.2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964), cert. denied, 166 So.2d 591 (Fla.1964). See generally Jaffee v. Jaffee, 394 So.2d 443 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Desjarlais v. Desjarlais, 681 So. 2d 847, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 10922, 1996 WL 592638 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

681 So. 2d 847 (Desjarlais v. Desjarlais) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Red v. Gnat
681 So. 2d 847 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)