Deshotels v. Ludeau

186 So. 26, 191 La. 554, 1938 La. LEXIS 1390
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 28, 1938·No. No. 34873.·Published

Opinion

*555 O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The issue in this case is the same as in the case of Mrs. Emma Rosa Tate Fontenot v. Emile Ludeau et al., La.Sup., 186 So. 21. 1 For the reasons given in the opinion rendered in that case, the judgment appealed from in this case is annulled, and the case is ordered remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion referred to. The defendants are to pay the costs of this appeal. The liability for all other court costs is to abide the final disposition of the case.

1

191 La. 540.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deshotels v. Ludeau, 186 So. 26, 191 La. 554, 1938 La. LEXIS 1390 (La. 1938).

186 So. 26 (Deshotels v. Ludeau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fontenot v. Ludeau
186 So. 21 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1938)