Deshotels v. Ludeau

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Deshotels v. Ludeau

186 So. 26, 191 La. 554, 1938 La. LEXIS 1390

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedNovember 28, 1938

DocketNo. 34873.

StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 26 (Deshotels v. Ludeau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Deshotels v. Ludeau, 186 So. 26, 191 La. 554, 1938 La. LEXIS 1390 (La. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

*555 O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The issue in this case is the same as in the case of Mrs. Emma Rosa Tate Fontenot v. Emile Ludeau et al., La.Sup., 186 So. 21. 1 For the reasons given in the opinion rendered in that case, the judgment appealed from in this case is annulled, and the case is ordered remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion referred to. The defendants are to pay the costs of this appeal. The liability for all other court costs is to abide the final disposition of the case.

1

191 La. 540.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*555 O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

The issue in this case is the same as in the case of Mrs. Emma Rosa Tate Fontenot v. Emile Ludeau et al., La.Sup., 186 So. 21. 1 For the reasons given in the opinion rendered in that case, the judgment appealed from in this case is annulled, and the case is ordered remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion referred to. The defendants are to pay the costs of this appeal. The liability for all other court costs is to abide the final disposition of the case.

1

191 La. 540.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

186 So. 26, 191 La. 554, 1938 La. LEXIS 1390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deshotels-v-ludeau-la-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack