DeShone v. DeShone

District Court of Appeal of Florida

DeShone v. DeShone

846 So. 2d 658, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8228, 2003 WL 21250905

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 2, 2003

DocketNo. 1D02-5265

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 846 So. 2d 658 (DeShone v. DeShone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeShone v. DeShone, 846 So. 2d 658, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8228, 2003 WL 21250905 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellee’s “Response to Appellant’s Response to Order to Show Cause,” which the Court treats as a motion to dismiss¹, the Court [659]*659has determined that the motion for rehearing below was not authorized. See Wagner v. Bieley, Wagner & Assocs., Inc., 263 So.2d 1 (Fla.1972). Consequently, the motion did not delay rendition of the order on appeal and the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Accordingly, the appellee’s motion to dismiss is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed as untimely.

DISMISSED.

ERVIN, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellee’s “Response to Appellant’s Response to Order to Show Cause,” which the Court treats as a motion to dismiss¹, the Court [659]*659has determined that the motion for rehearing below was not authorized. See Wagner v. Bieley, Wagner & Assocs., Inc., 263 So.2d 1 (Fla.1972). Consequently, the motion did not delay rendition of the order on appeal and the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Accordingly, the appellee’s motion to dismiss is hereby granted and the appeal is dismissed as untimely.

DISMISSED.

ERVIN, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

846 So. 2d 658, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8228, 2003 WL 21250905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deshone-v-deshone-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack