Deshon W. Pitt v. Commonwealth of Virginia
This text of 521 S.E.2d 790 (Deshon W. Pitt v. Commonwealth of Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UPON A REHEARING EN BANC
A divided panel of this Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court. See Pitt v. Commonwealth, 28 Va.App. 730, 508 S.E.2d 891 (1999). We stayed the mandate of that decision and granted rehearing en banc.
Upon rehearing en banc, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed without opinion by an evenly divided Court. Accordingly, the opinion previously rendered by a panel of this Court on January 5, 1999 is withdrawn, and the mandate entered on that date is vacated.
Chief Judge Fitzpatrick, Judges Benton, Coleman, Willis and Bumgardner voted to reverse the judgment of the trial court.
Judges Elder, Bray, Annunziata, Lemons and Frank voted to affirm said judgment.
It is ordered that the trial court allow counsel for the appellant a total fee of $925 for services rendered the appellant on this appeal, in addition to counsel’s costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses.
The Commonwealth shall recover of the appellant the amount paid court-appointed counsel to represent him in this proceeding, counsel’s costs and necessary direct out-of-pocket expenses, and the fees and costs to be assessed by the clerk of this Court and the clerk of the' trial court.
This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.
Costs due the Commonwealth by appellant in Court of Appeals of Virginia: Attorney’s fee $925.00 plus costs and expenses.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
521 S.E.2d 790, 31 Va. App. 173, 1999 Va. App. LEXIS 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deshon-w-pitt-v-commonwealth-of-virginia-vactapp-1999.