Deshler v. Cabiness
10 Ala. 959
Opinion
The case of St. John v. Garrow, 4 Porter, 223, is identical with this case. There, as here, the admission was made before the statute operated as a bar, and the effect of this admission was to postpone the operation of the statute three years longer. As the suit was commenced within the three years, the court correctly instructed the jury that the admission of the correctness of the account, if believed by them, took the case out of the statute.
Let the judgment be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Deshler v. Cabiness, 10 Ala. 959 (Ala. 1847).
10 Ala. 959 (Deshler v. Cabiness) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bradford v. Barclay
42 Ala. 375 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1868)
Pearson v. Darrington
32 Ala. 227 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1858)