Deshawn Thomas v. Charles Daniel, et al.

CourtDistrict Court, D. Nevada
DecidedJanuary 13, 2026
Docket2:18-cv-00020
StatusUnknown

This text of Deshawn Thomas v. Charles Daniel, et al. (Deshawn Thomas v. Charles Daniel, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deshawn Thomas v. Charles Daniel, et al., (D. Nev. 2026).

Opinion

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5 DESHAWN THOMAS, Case No. 2:18-cv-00020-GMN-EJY

6 Petitioner, v. ORDER 7 CHARLES DANIEL, et al., 8 Respondents. 9 10 Petitioner Deshawn Thomas commenced this habeas action by filing a Petition for Writ 11 of Habeas Corpus. ECF No. 6. The Court appointed counsel and entered a scheduling order. 12 ECF No. 9. Respondents have now filed a suggestion of death on the record indicating that 13 Thomas died on January 12, 2026. ECF No. 83. 14 The Court may entertain a state prisoner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus only on the 15 ground that he is “in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United 16 States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). A petitioner’s death renders the habeas petition moot. See Dove v. 17 United States, 423 U.S. 325 (1976) (per curiam) (dismissing petition for a writ of certiorari from 18 appellate decision in criminal proceedings upon petitioner’s death); Farmer v. McDaniel, 692 19 F.3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2012) (upon notice of petitioner’s death, appeal dismissed as moot and case 20 remanded to district court to dismiss habeas petition as moot); Garceau v. Woodford, 399 F.3d 21 1101 (9th Cir. 2005) (“Because petitioner’s death renders this case moot, the petition for a writ 22 of habeas corpus should be dismissed as moot.”); Griffey v. Lindsey, 349 F.3d 1157 (9th Cir. 23 2003) (same). 24 Thomas’s death constitutes an end to his detention; thus, this action no longer presents a 25 live case or controversy. Accordingly, the Petition challenging his state conviction is now moot. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// ] It is therefore ordered that Petitioner Deshawn Thomas’s Petition for Writ of Habeas 2 || Corpus (ECF No. 6) is dismissed without prejudice as moot, on account of Thomas’s death. 3 The Clerk of the Court is kindly directed to close this case and enter judgment 4 || accordingly 5 DATED: — January 13, 2026

GLOR 4 M. NAVARRO g UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Deshawn Thomas v. Charles Daniel, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deshawn-thomas-v-charles-daniel-et-al-nvd-2026.