Desfonds v. Comm. of MA

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·Decided November 10, 1993·No. 93-1537·Published

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion


November 10, 1993
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________

No. 93-1537

JOSEPH DESFONDS,

Petitioner, Appellant,

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS,

Respondent, Appellee.

____________________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. A. David Mazzone, U.S. District Judge]
___________________

____________________

Before

Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Torruella and Selya, Circuit Judges.
______________

____________________

Richard M. Passalacqua on brief for appellant.
______________________
Scott Harshbarger, Attorney General, and Elisabeth J. Medvedow,
_________________ ______________________
Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.

____________________

____________________

Per Curiam. After carefully reviewing the parties'
__________

briefs and the record, we find that this appeal does not

present a substantial question. See Local Rule 27.1. As a
___

result, the judgment of the district court is summarily

affirmed for essentially the reasons set forth in its
________

thorough Memorandum and Order dated April 9, 1993.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Desfonds v. Comm. of MA, (1st Cir. 1993).

Desfonds v. Comm. of MA (Desfonds v. Comm. of MA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.