Desfonds v. Comm. of MA
Opinion
USCA1 Opinion
November 10, 1993
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION]
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT
____________________
No. 93-1537
JOSEPH DESFONDS,
Petitioner, Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS,
Respondent, Appellee.
____________________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
[Hon. A. David Mazzone, U.S. District Judge]
___________________
____________________
Before
Breyer, Chief Judge,
___________
Torruella and Selya, Circuit Judges.
______________
____________________
Richard M. Passalacqua on brief for appellant.
______________________
Scott Harshbarger, Attorney General, and Elisabeth J. Medvedow,
_________________ ______________________
Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellee.
____________________
____________________
Per Curiam. After carefully reviewing the parties'
__________
briefs and the record, we find that this appeal does not
present a substantial question. See Local Rule 27.1. As a
___
result, the judgment of the district court is summarily
affirmed for essentially the reasons set forth in its
________
thorough Memorandum and Order dated April 9, 1993.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Desfonds v. Comm. of MA, (1st Cir. 1993).
Desfonds v. Comm. of MA (Desfonds v. Comm. of MA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.