Desert Palace, Inc., Dba Caesars Palace Hotel & Casino v. Costa

538 U.S. 959, 123 S. Ct. 1777, 155 L. Ed. 2d 510, 71 U.S.L.W. 3638, 2003 U.S. LEXIS 2724
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Desert Palace, Inc., Dba Caesars Palace Hotel & Casino v. Costa. Read the opinion of the Court — 537 U.S. 1099
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 7, 2003·No. 02-679·Published

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 537 U. S. 1099.] Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Desert Palace, Inc., Dba Caesars Palace Hotel & Casino v. Costa, 538 U.S. 959, 123 S. Ct. 1777, 155 L. Ed. 2d 510, 71 U.S.L.W. 3638, 2003 U.S. LEXIS 2724 (2003).

538 U.S. 959 (Desert Palace, Inc., Dba Caesars Palace Hotel & Casino v. Costa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.