Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc., and v. County of Riverside

Ninth Circuit

Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc., and v. County of Riverside

414 F.2d 832, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11610

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 7, 1969

Docket22689

StatusPublished

This text of 414 F.2d 832 (Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc., and v. County of Riverside) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Desert Outdoor Advertising, Inc., and v. County of Riverside, 414 F.2d 832, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 11610 (9th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

414 F.2d 832

DESERT OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE et al., Appellees.

No. 22689.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

July 7, 1969.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Peirson M. Hall, Judge. Kenneth A. Bryant (argued), of Waldron & Bryant, Santa Ana, Cal., for appellants.

Tilden L. Brooks (argued), Deputy County Counsel, Ray T. Sullivan, Jr., County Counsel, Steven A. Broiles, Deputy County Counsel, Riverside, Cal., for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and KILKENNY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the order of the district judge dated October 9, 1967, 302 F.Supp. 599.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI