DeSembly v. Dedman

170 S.W. 529, 161 Ky. 128, 1914 Ky. LEXIS 27
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedNovember 19, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 170 S.W. 529 (DeSembly v. Dedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeSembly v. Dedman, 170 S.W. 529, 161 Ky. 128, 1914 Ky. LEXIS 27 (Ky. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

— Reversing.

In tbis ease the appellant, Lettie C. DeSembly, a married woman, is endeavoring to recover tbe title to and possession of real property that was' sold at a tax sale; while tbe appellee, Dedman, insists that be is entitled to bold tbe property by virtue of purchases made at tax sales and deeds made pursuant thereto; or, if not, to have a lien for tbe taxes paid, with interest thereon, together with money expended in recording deeds, with interest thereon, as well as for tbe value of improvements put upon tbe property after bis purchase.

It appears from tbe record that tbe property in question was sold for taxes in 1908,19.09,1910 and 1911. Some of these sales were made by tbe city collector of Harrods-burg, others by tbe sheriff of Mercer County, and one at least by tbe revenue agent, and in each instance a deed was made. So far as the. sales made by tbe city collector and tbe sheriff are concerned, we have bad little difficulty in reaching a conclusion,, but when we come to adjudge tbe rights of tbe parties under tbe revenue agent’s sale and tbe Auditor’s deed made in pursuance thereof, a more serious question is presented. ¡

Section .4151-2, of tbe Kentucky Statutes, provides, in substance, that when real estate is sold for taxes, if no one will bid for and purchase it for tbe amount of taxes, interest and penalties, it shall be tbe duty of tbe sheriff to purchase for tbe State,■ county and taxing district; that tbe owner shall have tbe right to redeem tbe same from tbe State, county and taxing district, or any other [130]*130purchaser, at any time within two years from date of sale, by paying the purchase money and stipulated interest and penalty. It further provides that the State, county and district shall have the right of possession of lands purchased by them at any time after the expiration of the thirty days provided for in Section 4053, and that a purchaser other than the State, county and district shall have the right to possession at any time after the expiration of six months from the giving of the notice.

Section 4153 provides, in substance, that it shall be the duty of the county attorney to notify the owner of land purchased by the State, county and district, of such purchase, and if the land so purchased be not redeemed within thirty days from such notification, he shall institute a proceeding for the recovery of the possession of such land. It further provides that it shall be the duty of the purchaser other than the State, county and district, within fifty days after the sale to give notice in writing of such purchase to the owner of the land purchased by him; and if such land be not redeemed within six months after such notice, he may institute proceedings for the recovery of the possession.

Reading these two sections together, it will be seen that when no one else will purchase the property, it shall be bought in for the State, county and taxing district, and that when so bought in it shall be the duty of the county attorney to notify the owner of the land, and if the owner fails to' redeem the same within thirty days from such notification, the county attorney shall bring suit for the recovery of the possession of the land. If, however, the land is purchased by an individual, he shall give the purchaser notice within fifty days, and if the land be not redeemed within six months after such notice, he may institute proceedings for its recovery. These sections also provide for the right of redemption of the property by the owner at any time within two years from the date of sale. This provision for the redemption of the land within two years after the date of sale is a general one applicable to all owners, and without any exception every one has the right of redemption for two years notwithstanding the fact that by the giving of the notice required the possession of the property may pass to the purchaser.

Section 4154 provides, in substance, that if the land be not redeemed within the two years allowed for that purpose, the fee simple title thereto shall vest absolutely [131]*131in the State, county and district, where it has been purchased for them, or in the individual purchaser, as the case may be. It also provides that the revenue agent ’may after the two years allowed for redemption have expired, sell the land at public sale, and the auditor shall convey the same to the purchaser. This section, as will be seen, contemplates that at the expiration of the two years allowed for redemption the title in the' property, if not redeemed, shall vest in the State, county and taxing district, if they were the purchasers, or in the individual if he was the purchaser. But this divesture of the title of the owner at the end of two years does not embrace persons who are minors or married women or lunatics or persons laboring under other disabilities, for it is provided in Section 4156 that a minor or other person laboring under a legal disability, except a lunatic or married woman, at the date of sale shall have one year after the removal of the disability to redeem the property.

This section also provides that any purchaser other than the State, county and district shall forfeit his right to thfe purchase unless within six months after the sheriff shall have delivered to him the certificate of purchase he shall give notice in writing of his purchase to the married woman, lunatic or person laboring under other disabilities. It further provides that if the lands of a lunatic or .married woman be not redeemed within five years from the reception of the notice, the title shall-become absolute. So that under this section when the land of a minor or person laboring under a disability,' except a lunatic or a married woman, is sold, the right of redemption continues until after the expiration of one year from the removal of the disability, and as to lunatics and married women continues for fiye years after the reception of the notice.

In Section 4160 it is provided- that if the purchaser be the State, county and taxing district, the land may be redeemed for an infant any time during his infancy or within one year after his majority; and that the land of a married woman or lunatic may be redeemed at any time within the period mentioned in Section 4156; that is, five years-.

It will thus be seen that infants, married women, lunatics and persons laboring under a disability are given a much longer time to redeem the land than are other persons, although the purchaser may by giving the [132]*132notice provided for in Sections 4151, 4152 and 4153 get possession of the land. But the fee simple title of the owner is not divested until the time within which the land may be redeemed has expired. In other words, if the land of an adult male or unmarried female of sound •mind should be sold, the purchaser could get possession within six months after giving the notice of his purchase provided for in these sections, and if the land was not redeemed within two years the fee simple title would vest in the purchaser, as provided in Section 4154. But if the owner was a minor or lunatic or a married woman, while the purchaser might be entitled to possession by giving notice, he would not get the fee simple title until the time allowed to this class of persons to redeem had expired.

This right of redemption on the part of this class of persons is the same whether the purchaser at the tax sale be an individual or the State, county and taxing district.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth Ex Rel. Martin v. Union Labor Temple
131 S.W.2d 843 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1939)
Smith v. Isom
78 S.W.2d 752 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1935)
Shawler v. Carter
298 S.W. 714 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1927)
Buell v. Miracle
263 S.W. 734 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1924)
Brown's v. Greene
211 S.W. 860 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1919)
Forcht v. National Surety Co.
197 S.W. 545 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 S.W. 529, 161 Ky. 128, 1914 Ky. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/desembly-v-dedman-kyctapp-1914.