Deschamps v. L. Bamberger & Co.
This text of 30 A.2d 503 (Deschamps v. L. Bamberger & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court, with the reservation, however, that we do not consider or pass upon the points argued in the briéf of appellant respecting alleged error committed by the trial court in certain rulings on evidence made during the course of the trial, and alleged error contained in the submission of the matter to the jury, for the reason that these points are not properly set forth in the grounds of appeal. Booth v. Keegan, 108 N. J. L. 538.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
For affirmance —Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Dear, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 8.
For reversal—The Chancellor, Case, Colie, Wells, JJ. 4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 A.2d 503, 129 N.J.L. 517, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deschamps-v-l-bamberger-co-nj-1943.