Deschamps v. L. Bamberger & Co.

30 A.2d 503, 129 N.J.L. 517, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 209
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 8, 1943
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 30 A.2d 503 (Deschamps v. L. Bamberger & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deschamps v. L. Bamberger & Co., 30 A.2d 503, 129 N.J.L. 517, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 209 (N.J. 1943).

Opinion

*518 Per Curiam.

The judgment appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court, with the reservation, however, that we do not consider or pass upon the points argued in the briéf of appellant respecting alleged error committed by the trial court in certain rulings on evidence made during the course of the trial, and alleged error contained in the submission of the matter to the jury, for the reason that these points are not properly set forth in the grounds of appeal. Booth v. Keegan, 108 N. J. L. 538.

The judgment appealed from is affirmed.

For affirmance —Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Dear, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 8.

For reversal—The Chancellor, Case, Colie, Wells, JJ. 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alphonse Napolitano v. Eastern Motor Express, Inc
246 F.2d 249 (Third Circuit, 1957)
Hollander v. Smith & Smith
76 A.2d 697 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 A.2d 503, 129 N.J.L. 517, 1943 N.J. LEXIS 209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deschamps-v-l-bamberger-co-nj-1943.