Desaulniers v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

93 F. App'x 315
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedMarch 29, 2004
DocketNo. 02-9109
StatusPublished

This text of 93 F. App'x 315 (Desaulniers v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Desaulniers v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 93 F. App'x 315 (2d Cir. 2004).

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant, Karen Desaulniers appeals from a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York (Cedarbaum, J.), granting appellee’s motion to dismiss appellant’s complaint on the ground that the matter was barred by the three-year statute of limitations.

For the reasons stated in the district court’s cogent memorandum order, see Desaulniers v. Metro. Transp. Auth., No. 02 Civ. 3308, 2002 WL 1968381, 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15834 (S.D.N.Y. Aug.26, 2002), the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 F. App'x 315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/desaulniers-v-metropolitan-transportation-authority-ca2-2004.