DeSalvo v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

DeSalvo v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

240 A.D. 994

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1933·Published

Opinion

Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers unanimously affirmed, with costs. Findings seventh and tenth are stricken out on the ground that they are not supported by the evidence. We are of the opinion that the defendant failed to prove that the assured was attended by a physician for any ailment of consequence during the five years preceding the application, and that no false representation was proven in connection with the answer given to question 18. (Jenkins v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 257 N. Y. 289; Nowak v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen, 249 id. 78, 83.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers unanimously affirmed, with costs. Findings seventh and tenth are stricken out on the ground that they are not supported by the evidence. We are of the opinion that the defendant failed to prove that the assured was attended by a physician for any ailment of consequence during the five years preceding the application, and that no false representation was proven in connection with the answer given to question 18. (Jenkins v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 257 N. Y. 289; Nowak v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen, 249 id. 78, 83.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

DeSalvo v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 240 A.D. 994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

240 A.D. 994 (DeSalvo v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related