DeSalvo v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

240 A.D. 994

This text of 240 A.D. 994 (DeSalvo v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeSalvo v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 240 A.D. 994 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Judgment of the City Court of Yonkers unanimously affirmed, with costs. Findings seventh and tenth are stricken out on the ground that they are not supported by the evidence. We are of the opinion that the defendant failed to prove that the assured was attended by a physician for any ailment of consequence during the five years preceding the application, and that no false representation was proven in connection with the answer given to question 18. (Jenkins v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co., 257 N. Y. 289; Nowak v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen, 249 id. 78, 83.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenkins v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance
178 N.E. 9 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/desalvo-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1933.