Derti v. Barg

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided January 19, 2021·No. 7:19-cv-10215·Unknown

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ENDORSEMENT Derti v. Barg 19 CV 10215 (VB) On January 14, 2021, the Court received the attached letter from plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. (Doc. #27). Plaintiff requests leave to file an amended complaint and response to defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. # 22). A pro se litigant “should be afforded every reasonable opportunity to demonstrate he has a valid claim,” Satchell v. Dilworth, 745 F.3d 781, 785 (2d Cir. 1984), and should be granted leave to amend “at least once when a liberal reading of the complaint gives any indication that a valid claim might be stated,” Chavis v. Chappius, 618 F.3d 162, 170 (2d Cir. 2010). Accordingly, plaintiff's application is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint by February 9, 2021. Defendants shall have until March 2, 2021, to answer, move or otherwise respond to the amended complaint. The pending motion to dismiss is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion. (Doc. #22). Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket. Dated: January 19, 2021 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED:

Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Derti v. Barg, (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Derti v. Barg (Derti v. Barg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chavis v. Chappius
618 F.3d 162 (Second Circuit, 2010)
BNSF Railway Company v. United States
745 F.3d 774 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)