Derti v. Barg
This text of Derti v. Barg (Derti v. Barg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM ENDORSEMENT Derti v. Barg 19 CV 10215 (VB) On January 14, 2021, the Court received the attached letter from plaintiff, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. (Doc. #27). Plaintiff requests leave to file an amended complaint and response to defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. # 22). A pro se litigant “should be afforded every reasonable opportunity to demonstrate he has a valid claim,” Satchell v. Dilworth, 745 F.3d 781, 785 (2d Cir. 1984), and should be granted leave to amend “at least once when a liberal reading of the complaint gives any indication that a valid claim might be stated,” Chavis v. Chappius, 618 F.3d 162, 170 (2d Cir. 2010). Accordingly, plaintiff's application is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint by February 9, 2021. Defendants shall have until March 2, 2021, to answer, move or otherwise respond to the amended complaint. The pending motion to dismiss is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion. (Doc. #22). Chambers will mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket. Dated: January 19, 2021 White Plains, NY SO ORDERED:
Vincent L. Briccetti United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Derti v. Barg, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derti-v-barg-nysd-2021.